Scott Wilder, a former top person at Intuit, is a good friend. His Facebook posts seem to show that he has been waiting for AT&T U-verse web service for a month. I recently wrote Scott an earlier version of this on Facebook.
- - - - -
I hate AOL with a passion, but I would sooner take AOL, your in-law's wi-fi or ANYTHING ELSE over U-verse. Why would a very smart and extremely computer literate person like you fail to investigate the comments of U-verse customers? For gosh sakes Scott, there are 105,000 Google links to U-verse sucks!
As to an earlier comment (some companies sue over social network statements), truth is a total defense to libel or slander claims. Many original IBM PC development team members have been my friends since before they developed the PC. The third (unpublicized) team member convinced Bill Gates to stop giving away Basic (and make it a business). He later convinced IBM to buy an operating system from Bill, when he knew Bill did not have one. These people will gladly put their reputation on the line, to talk about U-verse fraud in speed claims.
Likewise, I have long said some H&R Block acts were fraud. This H&R Block fraud involved refund anticipation loans, investment advice, etc. H&R Block fraud caused many big class action lawsuits by State Attorneys and individuals. The H&R Block fraud settlements confirm this. There also is H&R Block fraud I IRS exam representation ads. An H&R manager, who worked for me long ago, added to my knowledge.
H&R Block fraud also involves an attack on my functional BlockTax trademark (see http://BlockTax.com/). It bears no resemblance to their bland green block. The attack, by an H&R Block Cayman (??) subsidiary, uses a local H&R Block attorney! It is an H&R Block fraud because they had a blocktax trademark, but dropped it in 1993. It also is H&R Block fraud to make legal damage claims with no proof of damages. There can be no such proof, as only I know how often I got called by someone looking for H&R (about once a month as Michael Block tax accountant, vs once a year since I became BlockTax). There also can be no proof because only I know how many times I converted confused H&R clients into my clients: NEVER, in 45 years!
Why would any CPA want to take advantage of some confused person, looking for cheap H&R non-CPAs and non-Internal Revenue Enrolled Agents? Why especially would a CPA take advantage of people not smart or careful enough to see the total lack of H&R integrity or quality?
Most of all, why would a CPA associate himself with the H&R Block fraud reputation if he already had a national reputation for QuickBooks and cutting taxes?
Truth is a total defense to a libel or slander claim, so bring it on!
Comment
This outrageous puff piece made me unsubscribe from AcountingToday. H&R Block should have been charged under the RICO Act for its criminal conspiracy. It did not disclose Refund Anticipation Loan kickbacks in federally required true annual interest calculations. There were billions of dollars in class action suits over this and other civil and criminal charges, concerning improper tax, ad and investment violations. One attorney was ordered off a case and referred to the Bar Association for prosecution.
That is why the federal Comptroller of the Currency recently barred H&R ALONE from making RALs (refund anticipation advances). H&R now has very misleading ads that sound like RALs. These Refund Anticipation advances are nothing more than the ability to designate a bank account for income tax refunds, which we all can do without H&R. Due to this, H&R has done around 10% less returns a year for 5 years and should have a far bigger drop this year. There are a series of related posts on my QuickBooks-Blog.
Posted by: MikeBlockCPA | January 18, 2011 2:36 PM